487
edits
(Added another) |
m (Added another) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
== Another "competitor" == | == Another "competitor" == | ||
Let's not forget Wampserver. While I still think UniSvr and XAMPP beat it easily, there are some nifty features, such as changing the active components. <p>[[User:BobS|BobS]] 16:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC) | Let's not forget Wampserver. While I still think UniSvr and XAMPP beat it easily, there are some nifty features, such as changing the active components. By the way, there are MANY reasons why UniSvr is a top contender, including production-level security, ease of installation and use, etc. <p>[[User:BobS|BobS]] 16:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC) |