Talk:The Uniform Server: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (moved Talk:Uniform Server to Talk:The Uniform Server) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
You should throw a download link on this page! Any self-respecting admin would know to Dl it at sourceforge, but ease of use, laziness and the odd newbie may enjoy such a luxury! =) | You should throw a download link on this page! Any self-respecting admin would know to Dl it at sourceforge, but ease of use, laziness and the odd newbie may enjoy such a luxury! =) | ||
--[[User:Hopskotch|Hopskotch]] 13:40, 12 Jul 2005 (PDT) | --[[User:Hopskotch|Hopskotch]] 13:40, 12 Jul 2005 (PDT) | ||
== download link? == | |||
k.. i will add it.. thanks :) | |||
--[[User:Olajideolaolorun|Olajide]] 19:04, 12 Jul 2005 (PDT) | |||
== Server configuration link == | |||
Should be http://localhost/a/ (with a slash in the end). | |||
== server admin panel == | |||
yeah, we have also changed it for 3.3 for the new admin panel :D so no worries | |||
== Another "competitor" == | |||
Let's not forget Wampserver. While I still think UniSvr and XAMPP beat it easily, there are some nifty features, such as changing the active components. By the way, there are MANY reasons why UniSvr is a top contender, including production-level security, ease of installation and use, etc. <p>[[User:BobS|BobS]] 16:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:24, 14 July 2011
download link?
You should throw a download link on this page! Any self-respecting admin would know to Dl it at sourceforge, but ease of use, laziness and the odd newbie may enjoy such a luxury! =) --Hopskotch 13:40, 12 Jul 2005 (PDT)
download link?
k.. i will add it.. thanks :)
--Olajide 19:04, 12 Jul 2005 (PDT)
Server configuration link
Should be http://localhost/a/ (with a slash in the end).
server admin panel
yeah, we have also changed it for 3.3 for the new admin panel :D so no worries
Another "competitor"
Let's not forget Wampserver. While I still think UniSvr and XAMPP beat it easily, there are some nifty features, such as changing the active components. By the way, there are MANY reasons why UniSvr is a top contender, including production-level security, ease of installation and use, etc.
BobS 16:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC)